The cryptography industry has witnessed a wide variety of digital signature schemes, each with specific features and strengths to address security issues in various applications. Among these schemes, BLS (Boneh-Lynn-Shacham) signatures have gained prominence as an advanced solution, especially in scenarios where both high efficiency and security are required.
Unlike other schemes such as ECDSA, Schnorr, multi-signature, threshold signature (TSS), and ring signature, BLS signatures are based on a unique mathematical approach: the use of bilinear pairings over elliptic curves.
In today’s article, we’ll explore the intricacies and advantages of BLS signatures, breaking down their operation, applications, and cryptographic challenges, as well as comparing their performance to the aforementioned schemes.
Introduction to digital signature schemes
Digital signature schemes are fundamental elements in modern cryptography, used to protect the authenticity and integrity of communications. In this context, BLS signatures stand out for their simplicity and efficiency, mainly in applications that require resource optimization.
Unlike schemes such as RSA or ECDSA, which rely on the difficulty of the discrete logarithm problem or factorization, BLS takes advantage of bilinear pairings on elliptic curves to provide security and authenticity. This technique also ensures the implementation of advanced features such as signature aggregation and support for threshold signatures (TSS) and multi-signatures, which have indispensable applications in distributed systems.
What are BLS signatures?
The BLS digital signature scheme uses bilinear pairings on elliptic curves, which gives it unique capabilities. One of the most prominent is signature aggregation, which allows multiple signatures generated by different messages or keys to be combined into a single compact signature.
This capability is particularly useful in distributed systems and high-performance networks, where reducing computational and storage costs is important.
Properties of BLS signatures
- Deterministic and unique: For a private key and a message, there is only one valid signature. This property differentiates BLS from schemes such as ECDSA or Schnorr, which rely on random numbers (nonces) to generate signatures, which can result in different signatures for the same message.
- Signature aggregation: It has the ability to combine multiple signatures into a single signature, making it useful in high-concurrency systems, such as transaction validation in distributed networks. Verification of signatures aggregated with BLS is more efficient than individual verification in schemes such as multi-signature, where each signature must be stored and verified independently.
- Non-malleability: BLS prevents signature malleability, i.e., malicious modification of a signature without detection. This improves resistance against attacks such as nonces reuse, a risk present in ECDSA.
- Efficiency: BLS signatures are much shorter compared to other schemes, which is beneficial in systems where storage space and bandwidth are limited.
Cryptographic components
The core of BLS signatures lies in the use of bilinear pairings on elliptic curves. These curves facilitate highly efficient operations that not only strengthen cryptographic security, but also allow the aggregation of multiple signatures into a single one, thus optimizing both performance and verification in distributed systems.
- Elliptic curve: BLS uses a special elliptic curve that supports bilinear pairings, allowing multiple aggregated signatures to be verified efficiently.
- Bilinear pairing: This is the mathematical function that allows combining two points on an elliptic curve and transforming them into a third in a finite field. This is crucial for signature verification and aggregation.
- Hash to curve: Before signing a message, it is transformed into a point on the elliptic curve by a hash function. This step ensures the security and integrity of the BLS scheme.
Signature and verification process
The signature and verification process follows these three steps:
- Key generation: The private key is a random number generated within a finite field. This private key is used to calculate the public key, which corresponds to a specific point on the elliptic curve.
- Signature: To sign a message, a process called hashing is first applied to the curve, which converts the message to a point on the elliptic curve. Once converted, the private key is used to generate the signature by applying an operation to that point.
- Verification: To verify the signature, two values are compared: one is the combination of the signature with a predetermined point on the curve, and the other is the combination of the hash of the message and the public key. If both values match, the signature is considered valid.
Comparison with other digital signature schemes
Schnorr signatures
Both schemes allow signature aggregation, but Schnorr does not use bilinear pairings, which makes it simpler. However, BLS has a significant advantage in the verification of aggregated signatures and its efficiency in distributed systems.
Multisignature
In multisignature schemes, multiple signers must generate and verify their signatures separately. With BLS, signatures can be aggregated into a single signature, reducing computational costs and storage space.
Threshold Signature Schemes (TSS)
BLS can be integrated into threshold signature schemes (TSS) efficiently, allowing only a subset of signers to generate a valid signature.
ECDSA
Despite its popularity, ECDSA does not support signature aggregation natively and is more susceptible to nonces reuse attacks. In contrast, BLS offers a deterministic design that improves security.
Ring Signatures
Although BLS is not designed to preserve anonymity like ring signatures, its focus on efficiency makes it more suitable for systems where scalability is a priority.
Applications of BLS signatures in distributed systems
BLS signatures are particularly valuable in Public Key Infrastructures (PKI) because they allow efficient verification of multiple certificates. Their ability to optimize the scalability of consensus algorithms makes it easy for multiple nodes to jointly and quickly sign blocks of transactions, which is essential in large distributed systems.
Their integration into Threshold Signature Schemes (TSS) further enhances their usefulness by allowing multiple parties to collaborate to generate valid signatures. This feature not only improves efficiency, but also adds an extra layer of security in distributed environments.
Applications of BLS signatures in cryptocurrencies
Although BLS signatures are not widely used in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, their adoption in Ethereum 2.0 marks an important milestone by optimizing its Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus system. The ability of BLS to efficiently aggregate signatures contributes to faster validation of transactions by multiple nodes, which significantly reduces computational and storage costs.
Applications of BLS signatures in decentralized identity systems
BLS signatures also have advantages in decentralized identity systems (DIDs). Their ability to aggregate signatures allows multiple IDs or credentials to be validated efficiently, eliminating the need to verify each signature individually. This reduces computational overhead, which is particularly useful in resource-constrained devices where efficiency is critical for system scalability.
Cryptographic challenges and limitations
Despite their significant advantages, BLS signatures are not without challenges and limitations. Among the main challenges are the following:
Security against quantum computing
Although BLS is secure under current cryptographic paradigms (e.g., security based on the discrete logarithm problem on elliptic curves), the advent of quantum computing could pose a significant threat.
Signatures based on bilinear pairings, such as BLS, could be vulnerable to advanced quantum algorithms, such as Shor’s algorithm, which would allow complex problems on elliptic curves to be solved efficiently. This is a challenge shared by many other signature schemes based on public key cryptography, although post-quantum schemes are already being investigated that may provide more secure solutions in the long run.
Rogue key attacks
A common challenge is the possibility of a rogue key attack, where an attacker can generate a malicious public key and then manipulate the verification of the added signatures. While this type of attack can be mitigated by certain cryptographic techniques, such as introducing additional validation mechanisms in the public keys, it is still an important aspect to consider when designing systems using BLS.
Cost of Bilinear Matching
Despite the efficiency of BLS in signature aggregation and verification, the computation of bilinear pairings remains a computationally expensive operation. Although this cost may be offset by the benefits of signature aggregation in large-scale environments, it remains a barrier in low-power applications or applications with limited computational resources.
Conclusion
BLS signatures represent a major advance in modern cryptography, distinguished by their aggregation capability, which maximizes efficiency in distributed and high-confidence systems. Its ability to combine multiple signatures into a single verification places them above other digital signature schemes such as Schnorr and ECDSA, especially in applications where resource optimization and advanced security are essential.
Despite these advantages, BLS signatures also present challenges, such as their vulnerability to quantum computing and the high computational cost of bilinear pairings. Therefore, it is imperative to continue to research and develop solutions that improve their implementation in various domains, from public key infrastructure to consensus schemes in DLTs.
Below is a video of Vitalik Buterin and Justin Drake discussing the BLS signature scheme adopted for Ethereum 2.0, and providing insight into its relevance and applications in today’s ecosystem.
Resources:
[1] Eth2book.info – BLS signatures
[2] Wikipedia – BLS digital signature
[3] Gist.github.com – BLS Signature for Busy People
[4] Boneh, Lynn, Shacham – Short signatures from the Weil pairing
[5] BLS Signature for Busy People
At Block&Capital, we strive to create an environment where growth and success are accessible to all. If you’re ready to take your career to the next level, we encourage you to join us.
Last posts
